When will you stop convincing yourself that you paid for digital ads, when all the evidence and your own common sense tells you they were invisible statues sold by (con) artists. In the years since 2012-13, when programmatic seriously took off, the red bars in the chart above show the growing disparity between reality (humans consuming media) and the invisible statue (invisible ads sold by the trillions through programmatic exchanges). They were afraid to speak up about it perhaps they were even the ones that convinced him to buy the invisible garments in the first place. But everyone in the emperor’s inner circle continued to praise the beautiful, invisible clothes, despite the fact that some of them could also see there was nothing there. Every commoner (ones with common sense) could plainly see the emperor prancing around without clothes. Perhaps another childhood story is appropriate here - the one about the emperor without clothes. "It wasn't what we had agreed on in the contract, but we got new and interesting art" from Haaning, Andersson said.Most ads are shown to bots, not humans Augustine Fou The museum says it's talking with him about that deadline it also acknowledges that Haaning did produce a provocative piece of work. The artist now faces a deadline to give the museum its money back on Jan. Haaning signed a contract with the Kunsten, promising to deliver the artwork and to return the $84,000. The museum isn't taking legal action - yet Under the agreement, the artist also receives a fee of 10,000 kroner, plus a "viewing fee" determined by the government. But Andersson says the museum's contract provides up to 6,000 euros, or nearly $7,000, for Haaning's work expenses. Haaning says he would have had to pay 25,000 kroner (around $2,900) to re-create his art work - an unfair burden, he told Danish radio. "If they are sitting on some s*** job and not getting money and are actually being asked to give money to go to work," they should take the money and run, he told the radio program. "I encourage other people who have just as miserable working conditions as me to do the same," he said, according to a translation from Artnet. Instead, he said, he wanted to create a work that dealt immediately with his own work situation. Haaning told P1 Morgen that he decided to keep the money after rejecting the idea of reproducing art that was more than a decade old. Niels Fabaek/Kunsten Museum of Modern ArtĪrtist urges the public: Take the money and run The empty canvas was meant to hold thousands of dollars in cash - but the artist chose to hang on to the money. Jens Haaning's artwork "Take the Money and Run" is seen in the Kunsten Musem of Modern Art. "I actually laughed as I saw it," Kunsten CEO Lasse Andersson said in an email to NPR, adding that the museum first suspected things might not go as planned when Haaning told them he had created a new piece of art, with the title "Take the Money and Run." But when staff members opened the boxes, they were surprised to find two blank canvases. Haaning sent two large crates to the museum, as it prepared to mount the work-themed show that opened last weekend. The artist had previously used two canvases, one larger than the other, to illustrate the gap in average annual incomes in Denmark and Austria in concrete terms - or, more accurately, in paper. Haaning took the money as part of an agreement with the Kunsten, which says it loaned Haaning more than half a million kroner so he could frame the cash in a reprise of an earlier artwork. Artist's unexpected delivery provoked laughter and questions The Kunsten Museum of Modern Art in Aalborg isn't satisfied with that explanation, but that hasn't stopped it from displaying the two canvases as part of its exhibition called Work It Out, which explores people's relationship with work. "The work is that I have taken their money," Haaning stated.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |